Harold Finney patents the Hawaiian Tremoloa - a fretless zither!
A BEAUTY of a design for an Accordion invented by Antonio Butti, filed on January 14, 1938, was issued its letters patent, TODAY IN IP HISTO®Y - March 1, 1938.
Harry Weymann patents the MANDOLUTE - a cross between a lute and a mandolin.
Andrew Cerrone fiddles a patent for a six-string violin divided in three pairs to provide two E strings, two A strings and two D strings. According to the claims, the principal advantage of this grouping in bands of strings enables the musician to play in octaves and in fifths giving a duet effect, and enhancing "the volume and tone and to otherwise modify the results of the instrument in such a manner as to enable the accomplishment of heretofore unobtainable results."
The Grandest of Patents for the GRAND PIANO is issued to Eric Gugler, assignor to Steinway & Sons.
Clarence FENDER "steals" a patent for his STEEL GUITAR design - dubbed a STRINGED TENSION CONTROLLING MEANS FOR LUTE TYPE INSTRUMENT.
THEODOR WEISSER, a subject of the German Emperor, and a resident of Neustadt, Schwarzwald, metes his letter patent for certain new and useful Improvements in Metronomes - "in which time in music is measured by clockwork mechanism with pendulum regulator with and without bell beat; and it consists in the novel construction of metronome hereinafter described, in which hammerstrokes on a fixed bell are regulated by means of a sliding lever, one end of which I form or provide with a toothed or notched scale to indicate the different measures to which the mechanism for operating the bell is set and at the same time to lock said lever in position.'
WRITTEN to the beat of SUCH DROLL PROSE -- "[t]he mainspring having been wound up by means of the key, actuates the clockwork, and the pendulum having been set in motion is kept swinging by the pallet action, the toothed wheels rotating with the main spindle. By the rotation of these wheels the end of the arm of the rod is raised by each tooth of the Wheel on which it rests as such tooth comes in contact with it, which causes the arm to press the extension of the hammer rod downward against the action of its spring, thus raising the hammer ready to strike. . . ONE NEEDS A BELL TO AWAKEN THE READER!
TODAY IN IP HISTO®Y 🎼 1921🗞 Harry Bernard applies his lips to paper covering his Native American Flute/Recorder: “Musical Instrument”, United States Patent 1,703,382, granted February 26, 1929.
Frederick H. Newlin taps a patent for a Tambourine. Although Newlin's tambourine may look familar, variations of these instruments were played in ancient Mesopotamia, Greece, and Rome, especially in religious contexts, and have long been prominent in Middle Eastern folk and religious use. Crusaders took them to Europe in the 13th century. The ancient Romans used them as did traveling musicians and entertainers in the Middle Ages. The 19th century made the tambourine a military-band instrument, appearing occasionally in the orchestra. In Europe, tambourines are associated with both folk and art music repertoire.
Mozart was among the earliest western composers to include tambourine in his compositions. Since the late eighteenth century it's a more permanent element of the western orchestral percussion section, often used to suggest an exotic or eastern flavor to western audiences.
Mentioned often in the Old Testament as an instrument of celebration, as here: "Then Miriam the prophetess, Aaron's sister, took a tambourine in her hand, and all the women followed her, with tambourines and dancing."
Grant C. Haium tunes up a patent for his "Hill-billy" instrument formed from a pitchfork with a tightened string, a simple drum and a cigar box. The novel invention allows the musician "to play a tune or melody and to accompany himself, if desired, by the rythmic beat of a bass drum" and was said to "promote achievement not of a renowned type, but rather of a captivating and humorous character calculated to appeal to a listener moved by the efforts of a humble performer.”
Ellwood Fry of Brooklyn, New York snags U.S. Pat. No. 399,396 for the SNARE strainer for DRUMs.
All modern snare drums are fitted with one of these mechanisms that enable performers to engage the snare wires relative to the drum head and to fine tune the tension of the snare wires. The ability to engage or release the snares when an open (muffled) sound, tom-tom, or (timbre) timbale effect is desired, is performed simply by manipulating the lever with a simple hand movement.
Quite ironically, however, Fry did not predict how his invention might alter modern percussion by enabling the drummer to use the snare to change the drum sound!
Indeed, Fry's claims did not relate to facilitating such vast changes in the drum sound, but instead, the claims related to the invention addressed only two functions: one being to release the snares after playing (especially in a damp or wet climate), allowing the drum skins to shrink back to their original length, and the other was that the clamp for the snares would act as a protecting shield from the tension screw to prevent marching band uniforms and clothing from getting torn or damaged.
Today, snare drums are a part of every modern drum kit.
John F. Stratton, a musical instrument dealer in Brooklyn, NY, sounds out U.S. Pat. No. 423,642 for his HARMONICA with deflecting and resonating chambers.
#patents
#weprotectimagination
#thispatentdoesnotsuck
W.I. Kirk patents a Stringed Musical Instrument "somewhat similar to a banjo, but embodying certain features usually present in an instrument known as the ukelele."
F.A. Buescher blows away the patent office with his WIND MUSICAL INSTRUMENT.
Harry Bettoney fingers U.S. Pat. No. 1,705,634 for a CLARINET with a body in the form of a single metal tube.
Henri Selmer, a musical instrument designer and dealer from Paris, France horns a U.S. Patent for his unique and exquisite saxophone.
Clarence Fender fires up another bird of prey.
Clarence FENDER of Fullerton, California rocks his design patent for the PRECISION BASS GUITAR.
the Ibanez Electric Guitar designed by William P Jarowsky
US Registration Number: 13064
Dated: March 02, 1886
US Serial Number: 71062166 Application Filing Date: Mar. 14, 1912
US Registration Number: 93009 Registration Date: Aug. 12, 1913
the first Barbie doll goes on display at the American Toy Fair in New York City.
Creepy creeping baby toy patented.
March 16, 1911
US Serial Number: 71017984 Application Filing Date: Mar. 17, 1906
US Registration Number: 66414 Registration Date: Nov. 26, 1907
Two of our favo®ite UDRP DOMAIN DISPUTE VICTORIESfrom the month of MA®CH:MOUNTAINVIEWCOUNTRYCLUB.COM (decided by NAF March 28, 2005)https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/416462.htmTB Proprietary Corp. c/o Toll Brothers, Inc. v Village at La Quinta RealtorsNot only did we successfully defend our client's ownership of this valuable domain name from an extremely large and well-known real estate developer, we we also able to obtain a rare finding of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking and bad faith on the part of the Complainant in instituting the proceeding."The Panel has determined that by bringing the Complaint in bad faith, Complainant has engaged in reverse domain name hijacking. See UDRP Rule 1 (“Reverse Domain Name Hijacking means using the Policy in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain-name holder of a domain name.”) see also Deutsche Welle v. DiamondWare Ltd., D2000-1202 (WIPO Jan 2, 2001) (Complaint considered to be brought in bad faith where Complainant must have known that Respondent was not a cybersquatter prior to the filing of the Complaint); see also Curb King Borderline Edging Inc. v. Edgetec Int’l Pty., FA 105892 (Nat. Arb. Forum May 10, 2002) (finding that, when Complainant is aware of facts that bear a direct relation to the dispute and fails to include them in its Complaint, Complainant’s omission constitutes an abuse of the administrative proceeding, warranting a finding of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking); see also G.A. Modefine S.A. v. A.R. Mani, D2001-0537 (WIPO July 20, 2001) (finding that Complainant, by omitting several relevant facts that would have undermined its position, had brought the Complaint in bad faith, which constituted an abuse of the administrative proceeding)....Accordingly, it is Ordered that the < mountainviewcountryclub.com > domain name remain as presently registered, with the right of the Respondent to do what it deems fit with the domain name.---------------------------------------------------SEKA.COM (decided by NAF - March 30, 2005)https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/420676.htmDorothiea H. Patton a.k.a. SEKA v. Psites, Inc. c/o Mark AnthonyOn behalf of the Complainant, SEKA, an actress and director of motion pictures who has used the stage name and designation SEKA in conjunction with the offering and sale of a variety of products, including video cassettes, DVDs, streaming video subscriptions, books, magazines, photographs, apparel, linens, and keychains, as well as services including fan club memberships, public appearances, fantasy entertainment and other services, we successfully recovered the domain name SEKA.com which was being used for a (competitive) adult-entertainment website.Therein, the Panel found:Complainant holds at least two trademark registrations with the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the SEKA mark (Reg. No. 1,331,757 issued April 23, 1985 and Reg. No. 1,331,622 issued April 23, 1985).Since 1977, Complainant has been featured in more than 175 adult films and has appeared as a guest on numerous television shows, including The Oprah Winfrey Show, Larry King Live, and Saturday Night Live. Complainant is known worldwide as “SEKA, The Platinum Princess of Porn,” and has been featured in adult-oriented magazines, such as Playbody, Penthouse, Club, Hustler, and others. In addition, Complainant has been featured in several mainstream magazines and newspapers, including Vanity Fair, The Wall Street Journal, and USA Today. Furthermore, Complainant has been the host of a nationally syndicated radio show from WLUP in Chicago and is the subject of a Swedish documentary film entitled Desperately Seeking SEKA.Respondent registered the <seka.com> domain name on September 9, 1998. Respondent is using the disputed domain name to resolve to an adult-oriented website, which offers Complainant’s photographs and motion pictures for sale and invites visitors to sign-up for membership subscriptions to view more photographs and streaming video of Complainant as well as the websites of other performers for one price. Furthermore, the website falsely claims to be the “Seka Porn Star Official Site” and “the Official Seka’s Fan Site” and prominently displays Complainant’s SEKA mark.Registration and Use in Bad FaithRespondent is using the <seka.com> domain name in an attempt to intentionally attract Internet users interested in locating Complainant’s products and services to Respondent’s commercial website. Internet users searching for Complainant’s authorized products and services are likely to type in Complainant’s SEKA mark followed by the common gTLD “.com.” Furthermore, Internet users are likely to become confused as to the sponsorship of Respondent’s website, which purports to be Complainant’s official fan website. Additionally, Respondent profits from its infringing use of Complainant’s mark in the domain name by selling membership subscriptions to its website as well as products and services that compete with Complainant. The Panel concludes under these circumstances that Respondent’s attempts to divert Internet users for commercial gain by attracting them to Respondent’s website through a likelihood of confusion with Complainant’s mark is evidence of bad faith registration and use pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(b)(iv). See Perot Sys. Corp. v. Perot.net, FA 95312 (Nat. Arb. Forum Aug. 29, 2000) (finding bad faith where the domain name in question is obviously connected with Complainant’s well-known marks, thus creating a likelihood of confusion strictly for commercial gain); see also MathForum.com, LLC v. Weiguang Huang, D2000-0743 (WIPO Aug. 17, 2000) (finding bad faith under Policy ¶ 4(b)(iv) where Respondent linked <drmath.com>, which contains Complainant’s Dr. Math mark, to a website run by Respondent, creating confusion for Internet users regarding the endorsement, sponsorship, of affiliation of the website).